Belleau Labs
Back to contracts

High Performance TacRS Constellation Satellite Platform

AFWERX · AFWERX TACFI · AFWERX

AI-Readiness Score
14/25
Pathway Speed
4/5
Timeline Realism
3/5
Problem Framing
3/5
AI / ML Fit
1/5
Award + Transition
3/5

Award

$3,800,000
Award ceiling
K2 SPACE CORPORATION
Awardee
Posted June 6, 2024

Description

The development proposed is a direct continuation of the development being conducted under our Phase II effort (“Tactically Responsive Satellite Constellation Platform”) which identifies DAF operational requirements, and advances the major bus subsystems (avionics, propulsion, power, GNC, thermal, and structure) and payload interfaces through the Preliminary Design Review (PDR) phase. This proposal builds on the research and development conducted under our Phase II SBIR, by preparing to integrate DAF payload(s) onto the first Mega Class satellite bus which is slated for launch in early FY26. The milestones include selecting the payloads; designing the mechanical, thermal, electrical, and software interfaces; defining those interfaces through Interface Control Documents (ICDs); and demonstrating those interfaces through a Hardware in the Loop (HITL) payload simulator. Additionally, this TACFI incorporates three milestones intended to keep our DAF customer and end-user informed on the overall progress of our bus development, culminating with a report on our first orbital mission in mid-CY24, a rideshare demonstration of key components to gain space heritage and demonstrate our ability to deliver, integrate, launch, and operate in space.

Score Rationale

The AFWERX TACFI pathway is a legitimate fast-track instrument warranting a high pathway score, and the $3.8M ceiling with a named orbital mission transition path is solid for award/transition. However, this solicitation scores very low on AI/ML fit — it is fundamentally a hardware engineering and systems integration effort (avionics, propulsion, GNC, thermal, ICDs, HITL simulators) with no meaningful AI component articulated; 'AI' is not even mentioned. Problem framing is reasonable for a space hardware continuation effort but lacks clear success metrics beyond milestone gates, and the unknown response deadline prevents a confident timeline realism score.

Source

View original posting
Back to all contracts